ENTRY
4_NGUYEN CAM HA_11041400_25031992
Argument structure and
fallacies
ITEM
1
Colin Closet asserts
that if we allow same-sex couples to marry, then the next thing we know we'll
be allowing people to marry their parents, their cars and even monkeys and thus
same sex marriages cannot be allowed
Structure
fallacy
If we allow same-sex couples to marry
Insufficient to conclude that we‘ll be allowing
people to marry their parents, their cars and even monkey
Because no evidence
is presented to show that the hypothesis will happen. We allow same-sex couples
to marry, it does not mean that we‘ll allowing people to marry their parents,
their cars and even monkeys . So the conclusion is not persuadable and correct.
Fallacy
of presumption: Slippery slope
ITEM
2
Smith, who
is from England, decides to attend graduates school at Ohio State University. He
has never been to the US before. The day after he arrives, he is walking back from
an orientation session and sees two white squirrels chasing each other around a
tree. In his next letter home, he tells his family that American squirrels are
white.
Structure
fallacy
Smith only sees two white squirrels in US , he draws a conclusion based on the
characteristic of two white squirrels that all squirrels in US are white. On
the other word, he uses the characteristic of small quantity to generalize the
characteristic of all squirrels American
Content
fallacy: Hasty generalization
ITEM
3

Structure
fallacy
it is presumed that
there are only two choices while in fact more options are available. You
can choose both of them or can choose other choices. You can live in US and do
not love this country or you can live in other country and love US very much.
False Dilemma
I think, you described all items in stead of explain it.
Trả lờiXóaIn item 3, you shuld add picture.
thanks for your comment, I will pay attention to that
Trả lờiXóa