Thứ Tư, 27 tháng 11, 2013

ENTRY 4_NGUYEN CAM HA_11041400_25031992
Argument structure and fallacies
ITEM 1
Colin Closet asserts that if we allow same-sex couples to marry, then the next thing we know we'll be allowing people to marry their parents, their cars and even monkeys and thus same sex marriages cannot be allowed
Structure fallacy
If we allow same-sex couples to marry
Insufficient to conclude that we‘ll be allowing people to marry their parents, their cars and even monkey
Because no evidence is presented to show that the hypothesis will happen. We allow same-sex couples to marry, it does not mean that we‘ll allowing people to marry their parents, their cars and even monkeys . So the conclusion is not persuadable and correct.
Fallacy of presumption: Slippery slope
ITEM 2
Smith, who is from England, decides to attend graduates school at Ohio State University. He has never been to the US before. The day after he arrives, he is walking back from an orientation session and sees two white squirrels chasing each other around a tree. In his next letter home, he tells his family that American squirrels are white.
Structure fallacy
Smith only sees two white squirrels in US , he draws a conclusion based on the characteristic of two white squirrels that all squirrels in US are white. On the other word, he uses the characteristic of small quantity to generalize the characteristic of all squirrels American
Content fallacy: Hasty generalization


ITEM 3

Structure fallacy
it is presumed that there are only two choices while in fact more options are available. You can choose both of them or can choose other choices. You can live in US and do not love this country or you can live in other country and love US very much.

False Dilemma

2 nhận xét:

  1. I think, you described all items in stead of explain it.
    In item 3, you shuld add picture.

    Trả lờiXóa
  2. thanks for your comment, I will pay attention to that

    Trả lờiXóa