ENTRY 4_Trần Thu Huyền_10031185

Item 1:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dplovax4HQo

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?

=> Fallacy of necessary and sufficient of conditions.

- Analysis: Vinamilk only contribute to enhanced height, but not enough to help eyesight completely dethay other food (fish, meat, fruits…) or other nutrients to be comprehensive child development.

Item 2:

"... Có ý kiến chẳng ngại chỉ trích việc nữ MC khoe ảnh hạnh phúc trên biển cùng người yêu trong khi người dân miền Trung đang "gồng mình" vất vả vì lũ lụt là hết sức phản cảm, thể hiện cách sống hơi bị vô tâm, hưởng thụ, ăn chơi trong khi chẳng bao giờ thấy cô đi làm từ thiện..."

Source: http://hn.eva.vn/lang-sao/ky-duyen-nhieu-nguoi-viet-tre-thich-chi-trich-c20a156538.html

=>  Personal attack fallacy

- Analysis: This the criticism is unfounded. Traveling and enjoying luxuries of life can not prove that Ki Duyen does not like charity or indifference floods in Central. Because in fact she is regularly participate in charity activities.

Item 3

Source: http://binhphuoc.org/kinh-te-xa-hoi-binh-phuoc/mot-'dong-tinh-gia'-trong-gioi-tre.html

=> Hasty generalization

- Analysis: There are many good-looking guys and good intelligence is not gay. Not handsome boy will be gay. And the guy is ugly and not necessarily the good guy calculated. Sentence on a hasty conclusions and groundless theory.